top of page
ZVP LOGO

Dual-Use Tech: A Smarter Investment Strategy? šŸš€

  • ido453
  • Apr 21
  • 1 min read

The defense-tech sector is undeniably exciting, but it comes with inherent challenges. As investors, we need to be strategic. Here's the breakdown:


Defense-Tech Advantages:


šŸ’° Massive budgets

ā© Significant gap between military and civilian tech

šŸ’” Civilian tech enhancing military capabilities


Defense-Tech Challenges:


šŸ¤ Smaller market compared to civilian

ā³ Lengthy sales cycles

āš–ļø Heavy regulation

āš™ļø Stringent development demands

🚪 Limited exit options


So, what's the optimal strategy? Many funds gravitate toward "dual-use" companies, offering solutions for both defense and civilian sectors. But is this always the best approach?


I argue for prioritizing dual-use companies with a strong civilian market focus!


Here's why:


šŸ‘‰ Civilian markets offer vast, rapidly expanding opportunities.

šŸ‘‰ Civilian-focused startups build a robust foundation before tackling defense complexities.

šŸ‘‰ Most civilian solutions can be adapted for military use, preserving that valuable option.


This approach acknowledges that early-stage startups often can't effectively pursue both markets simultaneously. By prioritizing the civilian market, they gain traction and establish a product, while retaining the potential for future expansion into defense.


ree

Ā 
Ā 
bottom of page